[hatari-devel] Higher precision when generating samples -> use nanosleep
Nicolas Pomarède
npomarede at corp.free.fr
Wed Jan 26 13:51:09 CET 2011
Le 26/01/2011 13:04, Laurent Sallafranque a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> For me, the best precision we obtain, the best hatari will work.
>
> How are the other atari emulator's working ?
> Saint ?
> Steem ?
>
> And WinUae ? (they managed to reach a good level of emulation, do they
> use nanosleep) ?
>
> Regards
>
> Laurent
>
It's different, these emulators are only working under Windows, so you
can use DirectX or similar API to get precise timers I guess.
Steem is ported to linux, but we don't have the sources, so can't say.
Our "problem" is that we want our solution to be portable and to work
under every supported OS, so we can't really use Steem/Saint/Winuae
approach, it's windows only.
Still, I think nanosleep() would be good, but it could be interesting to
hear from people coding under OSX/Windows.
Nicolas
More information about the hatari-devel
mailing list