[hatari-devel] Release list (was Demos tested today, some more demos tested)
Thomas Huth
huth at users.berlios.de
Sun Feb 28 16:00:55 CET 2010
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:45:22 +0200
Eero Tamminen <eerot at users.berlios.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 28 February 2010, David Savinkoff wrote:
> > hatari-1.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm was built on CentOS 5.4 (note library
> > dependencies)
> >
> > $ ldd hatari
> ...
> > $ ldd hmsa
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0042d000)
> > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x007fa000)
> > libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x0045f000)
> > libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00d81000)
> > libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x009a9000)
> > libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00110000)
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00213000)
> > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x009ec000)
> > libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00b54000)
> > libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x008ba000)
> > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00818000)
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00778000)
>
> Hm. So hmsa is linking (readline, png, X) libraries that it doesn't
> actually need. And next version would be unnecessarily depending
> on portaudio if it's dev stuff is available on the system...
>
> Thomas, do you think it makes sense to try to change this?
As far as I can see, these are only indirect dependencies
(dependencies from another library, not from hmsa itself).
Since hmsa does not use any function of these libraries at all,
this shouldn't be a problem, as far as I can tell.
Thomas
More information about the hatari-devel
mailing list