[hatari-devel] Release list (was Demos tested today, some more demos tested)

Thomas Huth huth at users.berlios.de
Sun Feb 28 16:00:55 CET 2010


On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:45:22 +0200
Eero Tamminen <eerot at users.berlios.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sunday 28 February 2010, David Savinkoff wrote:
> > hatari-1.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm was built on CentOS 5.4 (note library
> > dependencies)
> >
> > $ ldd hatari
> ...
> > $ ldd hmsa
> >  linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0042d000)
> >  libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x007fa000)
> >  libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x0045f000)
> >  libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00d81000)
> >  libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x009a9000)
> >  libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00110000)
> >  libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00213000)
> >  libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x009ec000)
> >  libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00b54000)
> >  libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x008ba000)
> >  libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00818000)
> >  /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00778000)
> 
> Hm.  So hmsa is linking (readline, png, X) libraries that it doesn't
> actually need.  And next version would be unnecessarily depending
> on portaudio if it's dev stuff is available on the system...
> 
> Thomas, do you think it makes sense to try to change this?

As far as I can see, these are only indirect dependencies
(dependencies from another library, not from hmsa itself).
Since hmsa does not use any function of these libraries at all,
this shouldn't be a problem, as far as I can tell.

 Thomas



More information about the hatari-devel mailing list